Inventing the AIDS Virus By Peter H. Duesberg (review). Peter D. Friedmann. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, Volume 40, Number 3, Spring , pp. So argues Dr. Peter Duesberg, one of the world’s leading microbiologists, a pioneer in the discovery of the HIV family of viruses, and a member of the National. Inventing the AIDS Virus has 93 ratings and 12 reviews. Seth said: This amazing book makes a good case that HIV is NOT the cause of AIDS. Duesberg is not.
|Published (Last):||24 November 2016|
|PDF File Size:||7.97 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.81 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Jul 07, Gael Fichet rated it did not like it. The author is hard to dismiss since he is a professor of molecular and cellular biology at UC Berkley, was h.duesgerg to the National Academy of Sciences, is an expert in retrovirus research, and was one of the first scientists to discover cancer genes. As proof of this self-interested conspiracy, Professor Duesberg contends that “the medical establishment has never erred on the side ofnoninfectious causation ofdisease” p.
Inventing the AIDS Virus – Wikipedia
Priya rated it liked it Jan 18, Kary Mullis Foreword by. View all 4 comments. He describes them as being captured by “virus hunters” after the Cutter Incident ofcontending that the war on cancer has been from the start primarily a search for cancer virusesand that funding for such searches had long since overtaken the development of chemotherapy for specific treatments of cancer and the study of chemicals as environmental causes of cancer, and that such misapplied pete are the primary reasons for the failure of that war to produce economically effective virys.
Duesberg seems to overlook the difference between immunosuppression and its manifesting diseases, some ofwhich have been classified Regnery Publishing, Pp. There are no discussion topics on this book pete. There are too many people dying due to misinformation and the drug companies quest for profit over truth.
Books by Peter H.
Epstein considered the book “readable and engaging I, too, see Duesberg as one day being heralded as a hero. Another book review from Orlando Sentinel. Perspectives h.duesbfrg Biology and Medicine. On the other hand, the science cited does not bore the person educated in science. A book review from Laissez Faire Books. A solid book with solid science.
Peter H. Duesberg, ‘Inventing the AIDS Virus’ Regnery USA , pages, ISBN
He is a major cancer researcher, virud he is supported by a number of Nobel Prize winners. It is one of the most informative books I have ever read, and I recommend that every scientist as well as non-scientist acquire it. Rabbitoh rated it it was ok Jun 27, All circumstantial evidence aside, the ultimate epidemiological test for HIV would be a casecontrolled [sic] comparison. Duesberg’s evidence – revealed in top scientific journals but kept out of the mainstream press – raises questions the AIDS research establishment has so far declined to answer: Indeed, not one of his profiled fellow dissenters Chapter 7 is a trained epidemiologist.
I’m hoping it’s before he passes, because this murderous streak has to come to an end.
Inventing the AIDS Virus
However, he wrote that Duesberg’s arguments potentially undermined public health injunctions about the need for safe sex and calls to offer clean needles to injecting drug users, that his conclusion that only a correlation between HIV and AIDS has been established is mistaken, that his views on the role of drugs in AIDS and the AIDS epidemic in Aidz were flawed, that studies on hemophiliacs conflicted with Duesberg’s views, and that Duesberg’s claim that HIV exists in a latent phase once integrated in vvirus host cell is incorrect.
He criticized Duesberg for the way he responded to “new evidence and contrary arguments”, giving as an example the way Duesberg repeated the claim that “HIV is found in far too few ;eter cells of AIDS patients to be a plausible destroyer of the immune system” despite more recent evidence showing “much higher blood levels of the virus”.
Jean Kremer rated it did not like it Jul 06, Cathy rated it really liked it Apr 25, AIDS denialist falsehoods from h.duesbberg crook who should be in jail. Duesberg maintains that AIDS is not an infectious disease.
Project MUSE promotes the creation and dissemination of essential humanities and social science resources through collaboration with libraries, publishers, and scholars worldwide. Not more funding for more flawed research. Alison Tomlinson rated it it was amazing Apr 09, Diego Solis rated it liked it Jan 23, Nov 11, Yolanda rated it really liked it Recommends it for: He accused Duesberg of “dogmatism” and wrote that he provided an “unquantitative critique of the biases of AIDS scientists”, and ” pages of seemingly scientific evidence in support of hypotheses that are widely regarded as wrong.
He granted that Duesberg raised “important questions about the scientific policing of deviant views”, but criticized him for creating a “conspiracy theory” about virus hunters suppressing vurus. Although I am not a virologist, my understanding is that we do not know everything there is to be known about the immune response to viral infection, and that it may be more complex than Professor Duesberg describes.
Mar 07, Douglas Wilson rated it it was amazing Shelves: Instead, he says that AIDS is caused by chemical factors and malnutrition. Crowe acknowledged that the book was controversial, but credited Duesberg with showing that “medical science has often before looked for an infectious cause to diseases that were actually caused by dietary deficiencies or even induced by drugs.
The house of cards is gonna come down before long, and when it does, Duesberg will look like a prophet. Early announcement from Ihventing Press. I learned much by reading this book.