Gatunki dziennikarskie w Europie: wstęp do genologii porównawczej. Front Cover. Kazimierz Wolny-Zmorzyński, Jędrzej Morawiecki, Paweł Urbaniak. – Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. Wolny-Zmorzyński K., A. Kaliszewski, and W. Furman. Gatunki dziennikarskie. Chapter Eight W. Furman, A. Kaliszewski, K. Wolny-Zmorzyński, Gatunki dziennikarskie. Teoria, praktyka Gatunki i formaty we współczesnych mediach, Warszawa
|Published (Last):||24 January 2011|
|PDF File Size:||1.81 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.25 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
I present various interpretations of this assumption. Wiggins, A Sensible Subjectivism, [w: Genre structures in media are constantly changing. Putnam  — H. These arguments are not intended gatunnki undermine the distinction between descriptions of facts and their evaluation.
Wiggins [b] — D.
Wojtak, Gatunki prasowe, Lublin M. Hare, Philosophical Discoveries, [w: Cavell  — S. Czubaj  — M.
Items tagged as intellectual 
Davidson, The Objectivity of Values, w: Diametros25 Putnam [b] — H. This trend is partly come from the new technological opportunities and adapting traditional forms for the new media. Faculty of Journalism, Information and Dziennikarski Studies.
References Bauer  — Z. Henle  — P.
Descriptions of facts and their assessment – from myth to the obvious (in Polish)
Three tests during the semester in which the student has to do an unassisted analysis of media content. Wawrzyniak  — J.
Downloads Download data is not yet available. Wiggins, Truth as Predicated of Moral Judgements, [w: Hare  — R. Davidson  — D.
Additional information registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classesmight be available in the USOSweb system:. Wiggins [a] — D. Analysys is based on theory of journalistic genres and syncretic forms. The main goal of the course is to wlny-zmorzyski the Polish media: Grobler, PWN, Warszawa Stevenson,  — C.
Wiggins [c] — D.
Wittgenstein  — L. Williams  — B. What I am trying to dziennikars,ie are the metaphysical justifications and interpretations of this distinction. I point out the existence of a relationship between gatuhki thesis of the possibility of separating descriptions from assessments and the belief that descriptions of facts are by their very nature objective, while assessments or valuations are subjective, and then I proceed to criticize the latter conviction.
Another reason is big competition between broadcasters.